Big news for AS certified clients from the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG), which is overseeing the writing and release of the new 2016 AS standards. There is a significant change regarding the implementation and upgrade timing for companies required to transition to the new AS standards.
After June 15, 2017 all AS audits must be to AS9100:2016, AS9110:2016 and AS9120:2016. There will be no more audits to the current AS standards after that time. Certified companies must upgrade on their regularly scheduled annual audit after June 15, 2017. For example, if a company just had an annual audit June 20, 2016, then they must upgrade to the new standard during their June 20, 2017 audit. Delaying transition until the June 2018 audit would not be an option. The final transition audit deadline for the AS9100D series is June 15, 2018.
Tight Transition Timelines
Important updates regarding the Aerospace and Automotive industries were shared with SimpleQuE representatives attending the Smithers Quality Assessment’s annual conference on July 14th. Speakers from the International Automotive Oversight Bureau (IAOB) and International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) provided insight into the upcoming changes to the ISO/TS 16949 and AS9100 standards. All are targeted for release in the last 4 months of this year, with certification bodies ready to audit to the new standards in the first quarter of 2017 for AS and possibly later for TS. Transition timelines are going to be exceedingly tight. Here are a few key takeaways:
- The IAOB recommends TS certified companies upgrade to ISO 9001:2015 now, prior to upgrading to TS. The benefit will be less audit days when upgrading to 16949:2016
- The IATF is still working on how it can have more time beyond the September 15, 2018 expiration, before ISO/TS 16949:2009 expires and the 16949:2016 standard has to be implemented.
- The IAOB was very careful not to say the new TS standard is based around ISO 9001:2015, but said it does follow the 10 clauses from Annex SL. They were also careful not to call the new standard ISO/TS 16949:2016.
- There are only 4,353 active TS certificates in the US, down from a high of almost 6,000 prior to the recession.
- OEM’s are raising the bar with the new TS standard and performance is key for the automotive supply chain. (See our previous post – Shifting into High Gear for what we learned about the Rome, Italy meeting with TS stakeholders earlier this year. Many things are still changing from that meeting, so expect differences with the final release.)
- AS is accelerating requirements to upgrade. After June 15, 2017 no certification body can perform audits to the current AS standards. After 6/15/17 all scheduled surveillance and recertification audits must be to the new 2016 standard.
- This prevents companies from waiting until the last minute to upgrade because there are a limited number of AS certification body auditors and it would not be possible to get everyone upgraded near the deadline.
- There is concern regarding the extremely tight timelines. Companies have a shorter amount of time to retrain internal auditors, conduct audits, do a new management review, and get upgraded at the next scheduled audit after 6/15/17. Watch for simpleQuE’s aerospace training on the new standard.
- Here are two scenarios of the new timing requirements communicated by SQA:
- If your last registrar audit was June 1, 2016 then you could delay upgrading to your June 2018 annual audit.
- If your last registrar audit was June 21, 2016 then you must upgrade during your June 2017 annual audit, and have no choice to delay until 2018.
Keep up with simpleQuE’s blog posts and training courses for the latest information affecting the quality world.
The Aerospace world is still anticipating release of the 2016 AS 9100 Series in October. In previous blogs I’ve covered some of the revisions to give you a more in-depth look at what’s to come and how it may impact your AS quality management system. One significant change is the requirement for greater control of external providers and sub-tier suppliers, based on risk. For example:
- Delegations in clause 8.4.2 require you to periodically monitor the external provider’s delegated verification activities. Auditors are going to look to see that you don’t just receive and file Certificates of Conformance or raw material certs or FAI’s. Companies will need to determine what monitoring means to you based on risk. This clause also requires that you implement a process for any external test reports, to evaluate the data in those test reports to confirm that the product meets requirements. If raw material is a significant operational risk (a critical item), there needs to be a process to validate the accuracy of test reports.
- Verification activities in clause 8.4.2 will require inspections or periodic testing when there is high risk of nonconformities including counterfeit parts. Periodic testing of raw materials has returned to the standard. The level and frequency is based on risk, historical problems, and being prone to counterfeit parts.
- Control of externally provided products and services in clause 8.4.1 will require your company to understand the risks to determine whether your supplier’s interaction with your sub-tier suppliers is as robust as expected and needed.
For more information about the new standard the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) and American Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) offer an AS9100:2016 Series Revision Overview.
AS91XX:2016 SNEAK PEAK
The new aerospace standards are due to be released in October. The changes apply to AS9100 for manufacturers, AS9110 for aircraft maintenance, AS9120 for distributors, and AS9115 for software. Tied with these is AS9101 primarily for the certification bodies on how to audit these standards. There are additional AS standards, some are guidance documents, like AS9146 Foreign Object Damage/Debris (FOD) Prevention, which are also changing.
SimpleQuE can help you to prepare and understand the impact to your organization. Therefore, over the coming weeks, we’ll cover the significant changes to expect with the release.
- There is a new clause 8.1.3 specifically focused on product safety and the workers’ impact. The added requirements to be aware of:
- Their contribution to product or service conformity (always in ISO, but could extend to temps, subcontractors and suppliers in your control)
- Their contribution to product safety (new, and includes flow down to external providers)
- The importance of ethical behavior (new, and includes flow down to external providers)
Product safety should be considered throughout the product lifecycle. Product lifecycle extends outside of the control of your company and includes supply chain, customers and end users. Our understanding is that auditors will be looking to see that you know where your parts are used, what the expected lifecycle may be, which can include obsolescence, and that your planning process really addresses and considers product safety through the entire product lifecycle.
- There is a new clause 8.1.4 specifically for counterfeit parts prevention, including suspect counterfeit parts. Counterfeit parts are typically focused around electronics, circuit boards, and fasteners. It can include raw materials and traceability. People don’t often think about counterfeit parts with intellectual property and trademark infringement. The standard wants to see that counterfeit parts, obsolescence of product, and risk are considered through engineering, purchasing, planning, control and inspections. It is also touched in other clauses 8.1 a, 6.3, 8.2.2 d, 8.3.3 f, 8.4.1, 8.4.2, 8.4.2 d, 8.4.3 k, 8.5.2 Note, and 8.7.1.
These are just a few of the changes. We’ll continue to publish more, so keep watching.